|
D.C. Dispatch
June 6, 2006
The latest fashion accessory on the campaign beat is something called "netroots."
Invasion of the NetrootsSummer's coming and you know what that means. Seasonal trend stories will be breaking out all over the media. In fact, they've already begun. The New York Times ran a hardy perennial last weekend, about those gigantic barbecue grills that appeal to what the paper called "a primal male urge." Wince if you must, but this is how we news people keep busy when everyone else is outside having fun. This being an even-numbered year, one of the media's really "hot" summer trends is a political one. The latest fashion accessory on the campaign beat, a must for any cutting-edge story or column, is something called "netroots." If you're obsessive about politics, you already know what the word means. If you aren't, bless you, and here's the dope: Netroots are grassroots Democratic activists who use the Web as their main megaphone and organizing tool. Yes, you've heard about these folks before under different labels. Sometimes a single word is enough to give an old trend new life. As the story is told, the netroots made Howard Dean famous and practically snagged him the presidency. Now they are busily going around the traditional party structure and the insiders who run it. The netroots have real power, the narrative suggests, and they might just change the way we elect our leaders. Several weeks ago, The Washington Post's Outlook section ran a much-discussed piece by Markos Moulitsas, founder of the popular blog Daily Kos and co-author of the book Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics. Moulitsas threw down the gauntlet at Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, techily noting that the netroots are displeased with her and might not let her become president: "Money and star power go a long way, but the netroots is now many times larger than it was only three years ago, and we have attractive alternatives to back (and fund), such as former Gov. Mark W. Warner and Sen. Russell Feingold.... Today we regard Hillary Clinton's candidacy as anything but inevitable." "Ouch," cried Hillary operatives everywhere. Or did they? It's hard to know how seriously to take these media trends and whether they have any impact on reality. Sometimes, the bigger a concept gets in the media, the more synthetic it feels. Howard "Sure Thing" Dean, a trend whose flames I personally fanned, didn't even get the nomination. At one point in his campaign, Dean actually declared himself a metrosexual, a rare instance of two unrelated trends fusing into a single moment of pure nonsense. In any case, the netroots are here and their media mentions are ramping up. A few weeks back, as the Al Gore boomlet was starting, Associated Press political writer Ron Fournier reported: "Gore is a longtime opponent of the Iraq war, which makes him a favorite of liberal Internet-savvy Democrats who dominate the party's emerging 'netroots.' " In the current issue of Newsweek, columnist Jonathan Alter writes: "Just as Linux lets tech-savvy users avoid Microsoft and design their own operating systems, so 'netroots' political organizers may succeed in redesigning our current nominating system." The Washington Post once reported that, thanks to Internet technology, "a new epoch in political communication is beginning ... as ever more citizens gain access to the Internet, and candidates begin to tap it as a means of wide, cheap, direct two-way communication with voters." That was 1994, and the writer was me. The point is, this revolution is always just about to happen. It's the novelty item that never dies, the Chia Pet of modern political journalism. The sharpest take on the netroots that I've seen so far was a short piece in last Sunday's New York Times Magazine. The writer, Matt Bai, pooh-poohed the notion that the netroots are reinventing American political power: "Those who lead the most consequential revolts against the status quo never really vanquish the party's insider establishment. They simply take its place." Next week, he reported, leading netroots will descend from the virtual world for a meet-and-greet at the Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas, just like flesh-pressing pols of old. Wait—the netroots are meeting in Vegas? Get me a reporter, fast. William Powers is a columnist for National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.
Discuss this article in Post & Riposte. More from National Journal |
Search
Recent commentary from National JournalInnocents in PrisonMany thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country. The Candidates' Four Detention CampsDeciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought. Crowd ControlEverybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing. Democratic SlugfestAn exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen. Shortsighted on JudgesSenate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi. Beyond Trade Adjustment AssistanceWorkers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons. The Poverty CandidatesJohn Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda. Are the Democrats Serious?Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege. Of Church and StateReligion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division. Flying Blind in a Red-Tape BlizzardBased on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years. |







