Gideon Rachman runs down a list of criteria for a successful revolution. Iran is currently fitting the bill. And, as Bagehot notes, you don't need a charismatic leader. In fact, it can be a handicap:
Viktor Yushchenko was positively boring throughout most of the orange
revolution. His speeches in Independence Square in Kiev were keenly
anticipated, but a few minutes after he began talking, after he had
started rambling on about Seneca or bee-keeping or whatever, people
generally began chatting among themselves. The point about Mr
Yushchenko was that he was, or seemed, honest (much more so than some
of his fellow revolutionaries, who subsequently joined him in
government). On the basis of Ukraine the conclusion might be that a
revolutionary leader needs to have what you might call "negative
capability": a persona blank, clean and undivisive enough to command
the trust of the diverse constituencies that it takes to bring about
change; a persona onto which the various elements of the revolutionary
coaltion can project their own goals and grievances.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2009/06/weighing-the-odds/199758/
