I don't think concern for it should be dismissed in the push for marriage equality, although I do believe that most of the fears are overblown. But the Connecticut law seems to me to strike a very good balance:
Religious groups warned that the bill would infringe on religious freedom and did win a late bipartisan compromise, as sponsors agreed to modify the proposal to more explicitly exempt church-affiliated groups from some provisions. The language closely mirrors that in a bill recently passed in Vermont, overriding a gubernatorial veto to legalize same-sex marriage in that state. The language expressly permits churches and related organizations - including church-owned venues and adoption agencies - to continue to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation as long as the specific services that discriminate do not receive funding from the state or federal government.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2009/04/protecting-religious-freedom/202687/
