Skip Navigation

The Daily Dish - 2006-2011 archives for The Daily Dish, featuring Andrew Sullivan

Should We Return To Clinton Era Tax Rates?

By The Daily Dish
Oct 13 2010, 9:43 AM ET

Jonathan Chait complains that conservatives are ignoring history when they comment on the expiration of the Bush tax cuts:

In 1993, conservatives unanimously predicted that Bill Clinton's tax increase on incomes over $200,000 would slow growth, reduce tax revenues, and likely cause a recession. Instead, of course, the economy boomed and revenue skyrocketed. Then George W. Bush cut upper-bracket tax rates, and conservatives predicted that this would cause the economy to grow even faster. Instead, the economy experienced the first business cycle where income was lower at the peak of the business cycle than it had been at the peak of the previous business cycle. It is rare that events so utterly repudiate an economic theory. None of this evidence has penetrated the conservative mind to the slightest degree. Reading the right-wing press, it is exactly as true today as it was 18 years ago that reducing Clinton-era upper-bracket tax rates holds the key to economic growth.

Despite reading Greg Mankiw, Reihan remains worried about what an increase in marginal tax rates will do to work incentives, and offers this proposal:

...let's focus on wasteful, duplicative, ineffective, and unwarranted spending first, reduce tax expenditures second, and then and only then consider raising the overall tax burden.

And have unicorns over for tea. In an ideal world, Reihan is right.



In reality, even the Tories are raising taxes because any attempt to tackle the debt realistically requires that. The Bush tax cuts became unaffordable as soon as we launched two wars. They were designed to end now. They are way lower than anything before Reagan, and the money has to be found somewhere. And what are the odds that the GOP will find $700 billion in "waste" next year? C'mon.

I think the ideal balance is roughly $2 of spending cuts for $1 of tax hikes. Most of the tax hike is going to come from people like me; and I don't like it, and do think it adds a disincentive to work harder. But I also realize that spending cuts in entitlements will hurt many and we're all in this together (or should be). If we don't do something serious soon, the US will default, and these worries will seem puny. And there's no one's income left to tax but the successful's - and a gas tax or VAT (the better options) seem totally unacceptable to most Americans. So let's get on with it, and stop this 1980s posturing. It's 2010, guys. Wake the fuck up.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

At the Supreme Court, Odds Lie Against Affirmative Action At the Supreme Court, Odds Lie Against Affirmative Action
Can Educators Ever Teach the N-Word? Can Teachers Ever Use the N-Word?
The Risks of Romney's Anti-China Rhetoric The Economic Risks of Romney's Anti-China Rhetoric
A Stereoscopic Music Video for Mint Julep's 'To the Sea' A Stereoscopic Music Video
Blue-Collar Votes Will Make or Break Santorum in Michigan and Beyond Blue-Collar Votes Will Make or Break Santorum in Michigan
Special Report
The Next Global Economies Reuters The Next Global Economies
Lessons from the BRICs — and a look at which developing countries are on the rise. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

More From Carnival 2012

Feb 22, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)