Polling The Public Option

More

It's striking to me that the polling reveals quite high support among Americans for some kind of government-run back-up, if private insurance is unaffordable. Here's the NYT poll showing 65 percent support for several months and only 26 percent opposition. The WSJ poll, while framing the issue more negatively, also finds a plurality of support and only a minority firmly opposed.

I should come off the fence here.

It seems to me that a public option which allows the government to use its huge buying power to achieve cost cuts that no private company could manage would be a Trojan horse. But a government option forbidden to use such leverage, but allowed to have an edge from administrative and overhead savings, is a useful compromise. It's one more incentive for cost control. The question is: what kind of public option? And what are the limits of its structural advantages?

Obama has pledged that any public option would be of the kind I could support. So why am I not yet reassured entirely?

Jump to comments

2006-2011 archives for The Daily Dish, featuring Andrew Sullivan

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down