Yet More Bad Arguments Against Taxes

More

By Conor Clarke

This New York Post piece on the proposed health-care surtax by Charles Hurt, David Seifman and Jennifer Fermino is really a piece of garbage. (It's ostenibly a news piece, although it comes with the slightly Dadaesque headline "DEM HEALTH RX A POI$ON PILL IN NY.")  When I read propaganda about how Obama will bring us tax rates of 60% during a recession I try to remember that: (1) There is a difference between marginal and effective tax rates; and (2) None of these proposals takes effect for the next couple of years (so it is not "a scary prospect in the midst of a recession"). And let me say it again: The effective federal rate for top earners -- the rate we should care about -- will still, with this surtax, be lower than it was in the mid-90s.

Effective rates top 1%

Jump to comments

2006-2011 archives for The Daily Dish, featuring Andrew Sullivan

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down