James Kwak praises a This American Life segment on "rescission of health insurance policies insurers’ established
practice of looking for ways to invalidate policies once it turns out
that the insured actually needs significant medical care." Innovation isn't always pretty:
The legal basis for rescission is that when you sign an insurance
application, you are warranting that the information on the application
is true; if it turns out not to be true, the insurer can get out of
your insurance contract. It’s particularly nasty in practice because
the insurer does not immediately investigate your application to
determine if it is accurate before selling you the policy (that would
be impractically expensive); instead, the insurer waits years, in
many cases until you actually need expensive health care, and then
does the investigation, which at that point is worth it because of the
payments the insurer could potentially avoid. Also, you can lose your
coverage for innocent mistakes, which are easy to make since the
application form asks you if you have ever seen a doctor for any one of
a long list of medical conditions that you are certain not to recognize
or understand. (In a Congressional hearing, the CEO of a health insurer
admitted that he did not know what several of the conditions listed on
his company’s application were.)
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus