|
|
« Previous Daily-dish | Next Daily-dish » |
|
Another Error In The DOMA Brief
ByA minor one perhaps, but worth pointing out:
Does DOMA really preserve "scarce government resources"? Would
repealing it really "obligate federal taxpayers" to subsidize gay
marriage? No. This is factually incorrect. At least, it is
factually incorrect according to the federal government itself. Five
years ago the Congressional Budget Office did an analysis (pdf) of the potential budgetary effects of recognizing same-sex marriages.
Presented by













.jpg)














