Ah, that word again. It can mean many things to many people. In Iran, it can be used to mean the traditional clerical establishment who find Ahmadinejad's messianic Twelver radicalism, especially in foreign policy, and his ignorance in economic policy distasteful. If you take the view that Mousavi is also part of the regime, he represents the more traditional foreign policy and a saner grip on economics.
I know it is light years away from the US but the distinction between Ahmadinejad's messianic, universalist faith and Mousavi's more realist traditionalism has some parallels in American conservatism - between the exceptionalist, religiously-grounded, expansionist fanaticism of the early Bush years and the creeping back to sanity in his second term - now followed by Obama's foreign policy worldview, which seems to feel at home somewhere between Bob Gates and Brent Scowcroft. Here's the quote from Memri that occasioned this thought. It's worth mulling:
Ahmadinejad has been relentlessly criticized by the conservative establishment throughout his term. This is due to his radical policy, fed by his messianic vision, primarily in foreign affairs - for example, his attitude to Iran's Arab neighbors, to Israel, to the issue of the Holocaust, and to Iran's nuclear issue, and particularly to his provocative stance in the nuclear issue vis-à-vis the West. Harsh criticism has also been directed against his economic policy, which has not managed to successfully address Iran's severe economic crisis.
Further, Ahmadinejad's activities against the economic interests of the moderate conservative school - primarily against the traditional ayatollahs, the financiers, and the bazaar merchants - and the fact that he has directed state economic resources to his support groups, primarily among the IRGC, have led to criticism against him by the traditional conservatives.
But above all, the radical messianic ideology that he has worked to promote, and his claim that the Islamic Revolution has deviated from its path under the 16 years of his predecessors Rafsanjani and Khatami, constitute very real threats to Iran's traditional conservative stream.
You can see the split between Palinesque populism and Pawlenty-style conservatism - in a vastly different and much less democratic context, of course. But when political movements are based in religion, these splits are common.
(Cartoon by Nikahang Kowsar in Rooz (Iran), May 10, 2009.)