|
|
« Previous Daily-dish | Next Daily-dish » |
|
How Bad Is It?, Ctd.
ByA reader writes:
It's worth noting that Megan's numbers assume a great deal. In the earliest stages of any flu
outbreak, there will typically be far more people who have the virus
than are actually tested and confirmed to have it. Only after public
awareness of the virus rises substantially will many people with flu symptoms feel compelled to seek medical treatment (after all, most of us get the flu
every couple of years and don't bother with the doctor), whereas most
deaths will be investigated. When compounded with the lack of access to
adequate health care in Mexico, it's even more likely that the ratio of
deaths to those infected will inevitably appear higher than it will
ultimately turn out to be. The comparative mildness of cases in the
U.S. so far would go further to suggest this. Having said that, the
young (but not too young) ages of those who have died so far is
troubling, and of course, this could turn out to be a nightmare. But
Megan is reading too much into the numbers as they exist now. For all
we know, swine flu may turn out to kill not many more than those killed in your average annual flu outbreak. Nothing to be insensitive to, mind you, but not quite the apocalypse.
Presented by













.jpg)














