Chem Warfare

Armchair Generalist's preliminary thoughts on the new WMD report:

I need to read this more in depth before commenting more, but I can't get over the deliberate lack of mention of chemical terrorism. It may not be a capability to take out a city, but certainly chemicals are more available and easier to use than either biological or radiological hazards. For biological terrorism being such the threat that they insinuate, they do not assess the government's current biodefense efforts (which are collectively getting $5-6 billion a year).