|
|
« Previous Daily-dish | Next Daily-dish » |
|
The LA Times Endorses
ByNot sure what difference it makes, but their argument is solid enough:
In the language of metaphor, Clinton is an essay, solid and reasoned; Obama is a poem, lyric and filled with possibility. Clinton would be a valuable and competent executive, but Obama matches her in substance and adds something that the nation has been missing far too long -- a sense of aspiration.
Presented by


























