Skip Navigation

The Daily Dish - 2006-2011 archives for The Daily Dish, featuring Andrew Sullivan

Spinning Atheism

By The Daily Dish
Oct 4 2007, 3:10 AM ET

A reader writes:

The problem with having no name for atheism is that it allows the atheists (people who choose to believe there is no god) to fudge the distinction between themselves and agnostics (people who assert that they do not know whether there is a god, and/or that it is impossible to know whether there is a god).  That would be beneficial P.R. for the atheists, because agnostics are quite a bit more popular than atheists.

What the atheists are avoiding is that their position, no less than that of theists, rests squarely on faith.  There is no way to reach by reason the proposition that there is or is not a god.  The only position compatible with reason is that we do not know.  That doesn't satisfy the atheists, though -- they must deny the existence of what they cannot know does not exist.

So, no, I don't agree with not calling atheists atheists.  Atheists should be called atheists, and agnostics should be called agnostics.  It is not the same thing.



Presented by

More at The Atlantic

10 of the Greatest Kisses in Literature The Greatest Kisses in Literature
A Short Animated Biography of tHOMAS Edison The Life of Thomas Edison, Animated
Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt Mutts Against Mitt
5 Lessons From the Rise of the BRICs 5 Lessons From the World's Great Rising Economies
9 fACES of the New Egypt 9 Faces of the New Egypt
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Valentine's Day 2012

Feb 14, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)