Skip Navigation

The Daily Dish - 2006-2011 archives for The Daily Dish, featuring Andrew Sullivan

The Dems and Clinton

By The Daily Dish
Jul 27 2007, 11:31 AM ET

A reader writes:

You asked:  "Remind me why any Democrat would back Clinton?" Let's see if I, as a level-headed Midwestern, former-Reagan Republican, current Democrat can jog your memory:

1968 – Humphrey

1972 – McGovern

1976 - Carter

1980 - Carter

1984 – Mondale

1988 – DUKAKIS

These are the people this party nominates. Much like the current Republicans who so alienate the majority of their conservative supporters by pandering to the base of the party, the Democrats don’t view the big picture realistically.  Rather than court the independent voter who is sick of the partisan pandering, they focus on the enemy before them and attack, pretending that independents don't exist. 

As you've noted recently, many of your Republican/conservative brothers and sisters are tired of the "party above all else, save Jesus" crowd.  They're thirsty for a viable alternative, and will go so far as to actually listen to HRC rather than dismiss her as a matter of course.  Despite this incredible opportunity to court independents so disgusted by Bush/Cheney/Rove, as well as to poach a large number of Republicans who are likewise disenfranchised, the Democrats will make the same mistake they always do.



They will go with the party loyalist, and that candidate who most pushes the far left agenda.  Regardless of this nascent appeal of Hillary, her negative numbers across the broader spectrum are still through the roof, especially when compared with the negatives of anyone else in the race on either side. 

The Democratic Convention will ignore the moderates in their own party, and the independents anxiously awaiting Bush’s ride off into the sunset.  The Democrats will nominate Hilary, when Obama has shown in poll after poll that he is electable due to his broad appeal among moderates and independents.  Unless this party recognizes the need to be the party of change as it did in 1992, or gets a viable third party candidate to run and pull votes from voters who would otherwise vote Republican (in the vein of Ross Perot in 1992) HRC will be join the list above.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Blame, Responsibility, and How We Talk About Syria How We Talk About Syria
Whitney Houston Has Died Whitney Houston's Greatest Hits
Why Israel Might Believe Attacking Iran Is Worthwhile Why Israeli Leaders Might Believe Attacking Iran Is Worth the Effort
The Implications of the Military Opening More Positions to Women The Implications of Adding More Women to Our Armed Forces
Using the Internet as Matchmaker: The Drawbacks to Online Dating Internet as Matchmaker: The Drawbacks to Online Dating
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Civil War, Part 3: The Stereographs

Feb 10, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)