Kaus and Honest Bloggery

A reader writes:

All that needs to be said about this Kaus flap is that when (finally) he admitted he was wrong on Nagourney, he buried it on the original already-several-days-old post; when he uncovered your 2001 entry, he made it his top post.

It's fundamentally dishonest. I read you routinely and I agree with you maybe 50 percent of the time, but at least you're "man" enough to make it prominent when you think you've erred.

Honest? Mickey? Like whence he actually got that email? And his actual connection to Coulter? As far as Mickey is concerned, full disclosure is for others, not him.