Maybe China's GDP Data Isn't Fake After All

Or at least not as fake as some observers have accused it of being.
china economy qz banner.jpg
An investor drinks in front of an electronic board showing stock information at a brokerage house in Hefei, Anhui province, on March 26, 2013. (Jianan Yu/Reuters)

Chinese economic data is often questioned by skeptics who believe government statisticians massage the numbers to make the Communist Party look like it's doing a good job at bringing prosperity to its many citizens. Figures like GDP growth have been called " too important a number politically to be reliable " and, more plainly, "a fake figure." Li Keqiang, China's new premier, called GDP figures "'man-made' and therefore unreliable," according to a U.S. diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks.

But a new report by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco calls this received wisdom into question. Its authors find that Chinese GDP numbers do tend to reflect data provided by more independent sources -- namely the exports and imports of China's trading partners, which are immune from any Beijing manipulation.

The Fed study first studied trade with China and its biggest trading partners: the U.S., the EU and Japan. It then compared Chinese growth and production statistics with figures from other trading partners around the world. As this chart shows, Chinese economic figures and the international data were broadly aligned, both in terms of the "trio" and the rest of the world.

China's GDP data broadly matches data from its trading partners. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

"We find no evidence that China's slowdown in 2012 was greater than officially reported," the Fed authors concluded.

Research that only examines one economic measure should be treated with caution. There are still big reasons to be skeptical, as evidence abounds that local governments and Beijing statisticians employ a number of tricks to keep growth looking good.

Last year, Chinese provinces collectively reported economic output that was significantly larger (paywall) in aggregate than the official figure statisticians produced for the country as a whole-- 57.6 trillion RMB vs. 51.9 trillion RMB, respectively. This led to jokes in the Chinese and Hong Kong media that China had a "missing province" somewhere that was obviously doing very well.

Meanwhile, Standard Chartered economist Stephen Green has said that China's official GDP figures were boosted by government statisticians underestimating inflation, which results in an overestimate of actual growth. And the New York Times recently discovered that some Chinese power plant managers were inflating output figures to hide the extent of a big slowdown in usage from the central government.

The study's authors themselves offer only a qualified judgment as to the truthfulness of Chinese GDP. Rather than offering a whole-hearted exculpation, they conclude: "We find no evidence that recently reported Chinese GDP figures are less reliable than usual."

Naomi Rovnick is a Quartz correspondent based in Taiwan.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple


What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?


The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City


Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.


The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in China

Just In