Mr. Dodd also appeared slightly annoyed that President Barack Obama threatened during his State of the Union speech last week to veto the legislation if administration officials weren't satisfied with it. Mr. Dodd called it "somewhat interesting" that the White House would threaten a veto when Mr. Dodd's bill was the only major piece of legislation in the Senate that had a chance of attracting Republican support. White House officials didn't respond to questions about Mr. Dodd's comments on the veto threat. Mr. Dodd also slammed the White House for not having answers to technical questions about the proposals, saying he was calling the administration and "not getting good answers."Dodd's anger is understandable. The Obama administration is clearly stepping on his toes. He's been working hard for the past two months to put something together that can actually get through the Senate, and the President's insistence on having this highly controversial measure included in the bill as a pre-requisite for his signature makes Dodd's job next to impossible. I think, ultimately, Dodd will call Obama's bluff on this one. It's incomprehensible that the President will refuse to sign a broad financial regulation bill similar to the one the House passed in December if it comes across his desk -- even if it doesn't include the Volcker plan. I just can't see Obama cutting off his nose to spite his face here. But this stance by Dodd pretty much puts the last nail in the coffin containing the Volcker plan. I interpreted it as an obvious political play from the very beginning, with little chance of actually making its way through Congress. Without Dodd's support, it doesn't stand a chance.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/02/dodds-resistance-to-volcker-plan-should-signal-its-death/35262/
