Milbank's complaints have nothing to do with the events of the past or the policy of the future. They have to do with Blankfein's attitude. The Goldman chief "made it plain that he was done apologizing" ... "smirked as they spoke, challenged the premises of their questions, offered frequent lectures of 'let me be clear,' and often responded to questions by asking questions of his own. [Blankfein] seems to exempt himself from the rules of man." Most of this is utterly besides the point, and that last part doesn't even make any sense.
Blankfein's prickliness in yesterday's testimony was often justified. For example, Angelides and Milbank seem flabbergasted that Goldman would sell mortgage securities and also place bets against them. But that's exactly what a market maker does. Angelides' comparison -- "selling a car with faulty brakes and then buying an insurance policy" -- is off. It's like screaming at a bookie for holding bets on the Colts in this weekend's game after taking your bet against the Colts. That's what bookies do. Congress summoned Goldman's chief to compare its core business to insurance fraud and he dared utter the phrase "let me be clear."
What the heck does it matter what Wall Street CEOs act like? We don't need to line up Fannie and Freddie
and subprime home owners and the ratings agencies and all the little financial sinners and wrap their
knuckles until Yom Kippur comes around. This is Congress, not
Confessional. Just pass financial regulation. Not doing so is the only thing that would require a national apology.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/01/im-tired-of-populist-rage-against-wall-st-ceos/33493/
