See web-only content:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/11/more-on-climategate/30899/
On a more serious note, this interview with the head of the UN's climate experts is ridiculous. He responds to concerns about the peer review process being stacked by saying . . . all the work was peer reviewed. I am open to being convinced that I should not care about hacked information, and I am a confirmed believer in AGW. So why can't, or won't, the climate change community mount a more compelling defense?
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/11/more-on-climategate/30899/
