Many technology enthusiasts suspect that the driver of the ban on Google Voice was AT&T, the carrier that currently enjoys the exclusive right to provide service to US iPhone owners. In a similar conflict, Apple allows Skype, the voice over internet protocol service, to work at WiFi hotspots but not over AT&T's main data connections. While using Google Voice still eats up airtime minutes, the inexpensive international calls could cut into AT&T profits. "I think it's AT&T being concerned about consumers looking to manage their costs," said Forrester analyst Charles Golvin. Apple also blocked an app called VoiceCentral.If Google Voice were only functional over WiFi like Skype, would Apple allow it? It's hard to imagine that they wouldn't, given they allow Skype. If Google really wants this software on the iPhone, redesigning the mobile version in this way could provide a strong argument for Apple allowing it. The other potential explanation, however, is that Apple is beginning to view Google as the competition. It should. As cell phones running Google's Android operating system gain popularity and challenge the iPhone platform, we may see Apple to continue to slowly back away from its cozy relationship with Google. Google Voice could be the first domino to fall on the way to that inevitable outcome. If Apple does become the competition, rather than an ally, Google will find itself in a very different competitive landscape in the years to come, especially considering the new challenge posed by the Yahosoft partnership announced today.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/07/apple-says-no-to-google-voice/22358/
