- Compliance is considerably easier to get from companies than it is from individuals; overall, I would expect the level of tax compliance to rise slightly under this scheme.
- Consumption taxes are generally agreed to be economically preferable to flat income taxes, because they encourage savings and investment.
- It ends the enormous amount of time that Americans spend trying to figure out their taxes.
- It involves radical tax simplification, an idea that would be endorsed by virtually every economist as an improvement over the current system.
- The prebate simplifies welfare policy by eliminating the means-testing component.
- It's unlikely to raise as much revenue as claimed
- Because the tax is not calculated separately, but included in the price, it would be to some extent less transparent than the income tax
- It will end up being quite regressive, with the highest effective burden falling on the lower tiers of the middle class.
- After eliminating the IRS, you're going to have to create a new, very large government bureaucracy to manage distribution of the "prebate". Also, now every American citizen will have to immediately register any change in address with the Federal government
- This will not stop politicians from playing games with the tax code; stand by for long campaign arguments over increasing the prebate.
This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2008/01/huckabee-hawks-the-fair-tax/2472/
