Ron Paul: the patron saint of lost causes

By Megan McArdle

Ross ponders what Ron Paul should do with all the money he's raising. His answer: pour the money into New Hampshire, hoping to break 7%. My answer: why not pour the money into something useful, like raising awareness about eminent domain abuses?

Ron Paul is not going to win. Ron Paul is the ultimate refutation of the notion that money is what determines races. Like fellow Texan Ross Perot, Paul appeals to people who are fed up with the political process, including a lot of libertarians. But many of his positions are deeply unpopular, and he can't triangulate because his precise appeal to his supporters is the image of standing rock-steady in the face of politics-as-usual. Nor has he, as far as I can tell, injected his own politics into the race by forcing other candidates to kowtow to him. Since he can't win, and isn't forcing other candidates to react, why not use the platform he has to push a single issue? Not the Iraq war, upon which no one seems open to much persuasion, but something where he might conceivably actually change America a little? Wasting it on actually trying to get elected seems extravagent.

This article available online at:

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2007/12/ron-paul-the-patron-saint-of-lost-causes/2402/