The Rotten NFL Scheme at the Heart of the AT&T-DirecTV Merger

The Sunday Ticket arrangement assures that only a small share of the American population can enjoy viewer choice on Sunday afternoons. And AT&T wants to own it.
More
Don't all Americans deserve to watch the best matchups? (Reuters)

First Comcast wants Time-Warner’s cable division, now AT&T wants DirecTV, the satellite-based cable carrier. Needless to say these corporate giants have only your best interests in mind!

Buried within the AT&T bid for DirecTV is an extreme anti-consumer measure that should draw the Justice Department’s ire: AT&T is angling to acquire a cartel arrangement that was designed 20 years ago to prevent viewer choice in watching America’s most popular sport, professional football.

On Sunday afternoons, football fans who tune in via cable or traditional rabbit ears are offered only whatever game the local CBS or Fox affiliate airs, regardless of whether a superior contest is happening at the same time. Often the game that’s shown is a woofer, while a quality pairing does not air. For instance, on December 29th, 2013, the defending Super Bowl champion Baltimore Ravens faced a must-win in their final regular-season contest: Victory meant return to the playoffs, defeat meant “shutting it down,” as jocks say. Much of the nation saw Ravens-Bengals, but Texas, Tennessee, and southern Indiana did not. These areas were shown a laff-riot pairing: 6-9 Titans versus 2-13 Texans, the league’s worst team.

(Think the Ravens game example above is some weird outlier? That same day, the Packers and Bears met in a winner-take-all for the final NFC playoff slot: the victor would reach the postseason, the vanquished go home. Much of the nation got this stellar contest. But Montana, Idaho, southern Illinois and Missouri saw a woofer: Seattle versus St. Louis, an also-ran with a losing record.)

The workaround for terrible games on your local channel is NFL Sunday Ticket, which for about $200 per season allows the viewer to watch whatever NFL tilt he or she prefers.

The first catch: Since its inception in 1994, Sunday Ticket has been available only to customers of DirecTV. The second catch: DirecTV is a great service if you can get it, but millions of American households cannot. Receiving DirecTV requires installing a dish with unobstructed line-of-sight to the sky above Texas, where the company’s satellite hangs. My house is surrounded by lovely greenhouse-gas-absorbing trees, so DirecTV is out of the question. Any dwelling with trees or other buildings on its southern facing can’t capture the DirecTV signal. Most of New York City, the Chicago Loop, and other downtowns are DirecTV-free zones.

(In theory, a location that can’t receive the DirecTV signal can get a waiver to purchase Sunday Ticket over the Web. In my case, DirecTV told me I wasn’t eligible for the waiver—after the company’s installer told me I’d never receive the signal. Anyway consumers should not need to set up Web-to-TV converter systems. Publicly subsidized products like Sunday Ticket should be available via cable.)

AT&T’s bid to acquire DirecTV includes acquisition of the Sunday Ticket exclusive. The Los Angeles Times reports that snapping up Sunday Ticket is a key goal of AT&T's. Professional football is among the most valuable brands on the entertainment landscape. What communications corporation wouldn’t want a monopoly over a major NFL product?

But the Sunday Ticket cartel arrangement assures that only a small share of the American population can enjoy viewer choice on Sunday afternoons. The same voters who are taxed to subsidize the NFL, to the tune around $1 billion annually, are denied a choice about what games to watch.

Adding insult to injury, anyone in Canada and Mexico can sign up for NFL Sunday Ticket, without cable-carrier restrictions. In those nations, telecommunication law forbids sole-carrier contracts. Inside the United States, the NFL’s antitrust waiver allows it to screw consumers with impunity. And screwing consumers with impunity is a prerogative AT&T wants too!

Jump to comments
Presented by

Gregg Easterbrook is a contributing editor of The Atlantic. He is the author of The Leading Indicators and The King of Sports: Football’s Impact on America.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Is Technology Shifting Our Moral Compass?

"The experience of taking another human life becomes much more trivial."


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Juice Cleanses: The Worst Diet

A doctor tries the ever-popular Master Cleanse. Sort of.

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Video

What If Emoji Lived Among Us?

A whimsical ad imagines what life would be like if emoji were real.

Video

Living Alone on a Sailboat

"If you think I'm a dirtbag, then you don't understand the lifestyle."

Feature

The Future of Iced Coffee

Are artisan businesses like Blue Bottle doomed to fail when they go mainstream?

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In