What Netflix's Epic Quarter Means for the Future of TV

The television business isn't endangered. It's growing. And the result is great news for anybody who loves TV.
More

615 house of cards spacey.jpg

Reuters

Netflix's grand strategy -- Step 1: Buy original content; Step 2: Add subscribers; Step 3: Profit -- is going just as planned.

The company added more than 3 million subscribers (2 million in the U.S.) last quarter, which, at $7.99 per subscription, means revenue nearly equaled the full price of the $100 million "House of Cards" series that debuted early this year.

Did "House of Cards" lure 2 million more people, alone? No. We don't know how many Netflix subscribers watched the series, and we certainly don't know what share of the new subs joined just specifically because of the Kevin Spacey vehicle.

So what did "House of Cards" really buy? Allegiance. Nearly 90 percent of Netflix subscribers said "House of Cards" made them less likely to cancel, according to a survey by Cowen and Co. But here's what "House of Cards" doesn't get Netflix: the right to raise prices. Two-thirds of subscribers said they'd bolt Netflix if they raised the monthly price.

Netflix epic win this month is great news for Netflix shareholders and great news TV lovers everywhere. If you like expensive, high-quality TV, you should root for Netflix and Amazon and Hulu and HBO to go after each other for exclusive rights for content. It means more wholesale demand for great television. It means better incentives for Hollywood's stars to become executive producers and showrunners. It means more great television.

But I'm not yet convinced that Netflix has a clear long-term advantage over its top competitors -- particularly Amazon Prime and cable (+HBO). First, nobody has more good will from public investors than Amazon, where CEO Jeff Bezos has trained the stock market to accept zero profits forever, since the company is viewed as a terrifying quasi-monopoly in e-commerce. This gives him a dangerous license to spend with abandon on TV licensing deals.

Second, even though Netflix is successfully setting itself up as a competitor to HBO, it's still a complement to, not a substitute for, the behemoth of the cable bundle, because it doesn't have the keystone that holds the whole thing together: live sports.

For years, some TV watchers have predicted the demise of the traditional television business. The irony is that, even in a weak economy, what we're seeing today is the proliferation of the traditional television business of paid subscriptions. Multi-channel video subs are holding steady -- and HBO/Showtime subs are growing -- while Netflix screams toward 30 million American subscribers, and Amazon and Hulu Plus continue to grow.

For a country that apparently doesn't want to pay more for television, we're doing a pretty pitiful job at it.

>

Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Juice Cleanses: The Worst Diet

A doctor tries the ever-popular Master Cleanse. Sort of.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Juice Cleanses: The Worst Diet

A doctor tries the ever-popular Master Cleanse. Sort of.

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Video

What If Emoji Lived Among Us?

A whimsical ad imagines what life would be like if emoji were real.

Video

Living Alone on a Sailboat

"If you think I'm a dirtbag, then you don't understand the lifestyle."

Feature

The Future of Iced Coffee

Are artisan businesses like Blue Bottle doomed to fail when they go mainstream?

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In