The Rich Countries With the Most Generous Unemployment Benefits

More
Losing your job is awful, but it's less awful in some places than in others. Call it the real estate rule of unemployment -- it's all about location, location, location. But where's the "best" (or least awful) place to lose your job? Israel.

Unemployment is created equal but unemployment benefits are not. The chart below, from this OECD benefits calculator, gives us a picture of just how unequal social safety nets are across rich countries when it comes to joblessness. It shows household income with unemployment benefits as a percentage of previous household income back from 2010 -- note that this includes a working spouse's income. In each case, I've assumed that people who lost their jobs had salaries equal to their country's average salary beforehand. Notice the difference between Anglo-Saxon and European capitalism -- Anglophone countries are stingier than their continental counterparts when it comes to helping the unemployed, especially if they don't have kids.

UIinOECD.png

There's a lot to take in here. But the big takeaway is how little correlation there is between unemployment rates and unemployment benefits. Relatively less generous benefits haven't saved Greece nor have generous benefits doomed Israel. That's not to say that better benefits don't affect incentives at the margin -- they do. But what rocked the global economy in 2008 was the mother of all demand shocks. 

In other words, it was a Great Recession and not a Great Vacation. The latter is what University of Chicago professor Casey Mulligan thinks happened after 2007 -- in other words, cushier benefits made people less willing to work. Now, it's true that unemployment benefits have been extended the past few years, but it's not as if benefits themselves are better. Compare the replacement value of unemployment benefits in 2007 and 2010 for the United States. That's not what any kind of vacation, let alone a great one, looks like.
UIinUS.png

Incentives matter, but so does the macroeconomy. In plain English, we don't want a social safety net that encourages people to stay in it, but the best way to do that isn't to make life in the safety net miserable -- it's to make life outside it better. Look at Israel. They have a safety net that Paul Ryan would probably call a hammock, but unemployment only peaked at around 8 percent during the crisis and recovered quite rapidly, thanks to some aggressive monetary policy.

Benefits matter. Growth matters more.
Jump to comments
Presented by

Matthew O'Brien

Matthew O'Brien is a former senior associate editor at The Atlantic.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Where the Wildest Things Are

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where the Wild Things Go

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Adults Need Playtime Too

When was the last time you played your favorite childhood game?

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In