Low-Income Smokers in New York Spend 25% of Their Income on Cigarettes

More

Smokers in New York State earning less than $30,000 a year spent spent 25% of their income on cigarettes, according to a new study from the Public Health and Policy Research program of RTI, a nonprofit institute. Even more surprising, they paid nearly 40% percent of New York's cigarette tax revenue.

This extraordinary stat reminds me of another extraordinary stat: That households earning less than $13,000 a year -- so,  considerably poorer than the population ACS studied -- spend a shocking 9% of their money on lottery tickets. I have no reason to think that either statistic is definitely wrong, but both stats strain credulity, at least judged against aggregate data compiled by the Consumer Expenditure Survey.

Here's the CES data on the poorest 40% of Americans, who spend an average $25,000 a year. They use 15% of their income on food, 40% of their income on housing, 4% on clothes, 15% on transportation, 8% on health care, 5% on entertainment, and about 1.5% on "tobacco products and smoking supplies." Don't pay too much attention to the 1.5% figure, since smoking isn't the kind of thing that all households do in similar moderation: There are addicts and there are those who don't touch the stuff, so the average number doesn't mean much. I'm more interested in the fact that New York smokers spend more on their recreational addiction than the average low income family spends on transportation, entertainment, and clothes, combined -- and this in a state with high taxes and living costs.

How the Low-Income Spend Money

Screen Shot 2012-09-20 at 10.33.37 AM.png

Smoking advocates claim the study proves that high cigarette taxes are "regressive and ineffective." Well, they are regressive. You can't "means-test" a sin tax, unless you require every bodega owner to ask for IRS documents. Also, I don't know that the study proves the tax is ineffective. A sin tax has two purposes: (1) to discourage a behavior that imposes a social cost, like inevitable health care costs; and (2) to raise money in the event that the behavior is discouraged. It's really awful that low-income families are paying nearly half of total cigarette taxe. But the tax is working. Smoking rates in New York are at record lows.

>

Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

The Death of Film: After Hollywood Goes Digital, What Happens to Movies?

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In