8.5% Unemployment: Why 2011's Best Jobs Report Still Isn't Good Enough

More

The U.S. economy added 200,000 jobs in December, and unemployment fell to its lowest point in three years. And yet...
Screen Shot 2012-01-06 at 9.26.27 AM.pngCalculated Risk

The last jobs report of 2011 was perhaps the year's best, with moderate improvements everywhere, from overall employment to earnings. It's not great jobs report, mind you. But in a lukewarm year for job growth, it's a sign that the economy is getting warmer.

All the good news in one paragraph: We added 200,000 jobs in December -- 50 percent better than our monthly average last year. The official unemployment rate fell to 8.5 percent, the lowest in three years. The broader measure of unemployment, which accounts for marginally attached workers, fell to 15.2%, the lowest since Feb. 2009. For the full year 2011, the U.S. economy added 1.64 million jobs, our best in five years. Average hourly earnings were up. Weekly hours were up. Discouraged workers have fallen by more than 370,000 in the last year.

That's the good news, and it's illustrated by the bright red line in the graph below. But here's the problem. The unemployment rate is falling in large part because millions of people have dropped out of the labor market entirely. That point is illustrated by the black line below, which tracks the fading employment-population ratio. If the size of the workforce were the same as when Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.9 percent.

Screen Shot 2012-01-06 at 9.26.15 AM.png

When the strengthening economy attracts more job seekers, the unemployment rate will go up. It's just math. If the denominator (the size of the labor market) starts growing, we'll need the numerator (the number of employed people) to grow much faster to compensate. If I'm wrong, and the participation rate doesn't go up, it will represent a kind of permanent shadow-group of people neither working nor counted as unemployed.

I like to end these jobs reports with a graph from the Hamilton Project that shows how long it would take to make back the jobs we lost in the Great Recession at various rates. If we create 200,000 jobs a month, as we did in December, we'll fill the jobs gap by about 2024.
Screen Shot 2011-12-02 at 10.02.56 AM.png



Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Saving Central: One High School's Struggle After Resegregation

Meet the students and staff at Tuscaloosa’s all-black Central High School in a short documentary film by Maisie Crow. 


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In