The Behavioral Economist's Guide to Buying Presents

More

Worried about what to buy for for your loved ones this holiday seasons? Here's what researchers have to say about what makes a good gift.  

615_Christmas_Store_Display.jpg

Reuters

Christmas cheer isn't cheap. Not in America. According to the National Retail Federation, U.S. shoppers spent more than $700 each on presents last holiday season -- about the same as a median month's rent.

Gift buying, as we all know, can be a fraught experience. Do you try and pick out that perfect shawl-neck sweater for your brother, or play it safe with a J. Crew gift card? Do you buy your college freshman cousin that Velvet Underground box set you loved so much at their age (and which they'll obviously learn to enjoy!), or go with the XBox game you know they really want?

These are painful, perennial questions. Thankfully, dorky academics have been investigating the nuances and norms of gift giving for decades. We've compiled a few of their findings into a Behavioral Economist's Guide to Gift Giving. Read up, and shop confidently.

What is the single best possible gift?

Cash money.

Money is the soundest gift for one simple reason: It guarantees that the recipient gets exactly what they want.

In 1993, economist Joel Waldfogel published a study with a title that only the Grinch could love: "The Deadweight Loss of Christmas." Deadweight loss is the term economists use to describe the gap between what we spend on something and what it's actually worth. Because people rarely know exactly what their friends and loved ones want, Waldfogel decided to ask a simple, slightly uncomfortable question: How much value do we waste every year by picking the wrong holiday gifts?

To find an answer, he surveyed a group of Yale undergraduates. He concluded that gift giving "destroys" between a tenth and a third of the value in what we buy. In other words, if you spend $100 on that Santa-red cardigan at Macy's, chances are whoever gets it will only value your gift between $70 and $90. Some groups had a better gift radar than others. Grandparents, aunts and uncles had the worst sense of what to buy. Friends and significant others had the best. But ultimately, cash was just more efficient.

So if you're feeling uncertainty, don't guess. Do everyone a favor and go with greenbacks. Or at least a gift card.

Gee, that seems impersonal. What if I don't want to give cash?

Focus on the message.

If you do decide to try and pick out something personal, stop and think: What do I want to say? Gifts send messages. We talk through them. And that's where much of their value is bundled -- for both the giver and the recipient. To quote California State Unviversity Professor Mary Finely Walfinbarger, "in primitive cultures, the gift was equally economic and symbolic. In societies with well-developed markets, it is hardly surprising that the gift has been at least partially stripped of its economic importance, leaving in a much more prominent position the symbolic value...."

As University of Chicago business professors Canice Prendergast and Lars Stole have argued, gifts also are used to demonstrate our "certainty" about potential mates. The more familiar we are about a person, the more easily we can try and pick something specific to their tastes. It's the difference between getting your boyfriend a bottle of Jack Daniels, or knowing his favorite bourbon is Elmer T. Lee. As the two researchers put it, "an individual who can show that he understands the preferences of his partner is likely to be a more desirable partner than one who has no idea what his partner wants or believes in."

So what do I get for that special someone?

Buying for a guy? Get him a gadget. Buying for a girl? Get her something expensive and useless.

At the University of Utah, Professors Russell Belk and Laurence Coon analyzed the dating experiences of men and women, and found three main purposes for presents: social exchange, economic exchange, or a sign of "agapic" -- that would be Greek for "selfless" -- love. In the social sense, gifts were seen as a symbol of commitment. In the economic context, men saw gifts as a way to get sex. Women, meanwhile, tended to be more agapic, giving out of the goodness of their hearts.  

But what did men and women actually want? Belk and Coon found women care about the symbolic value, whereas men are more interested in the utility. So women are best off getting their guy a gadget. Men are better off going sentimental. Or extravagant.

In his book The Mating Mind, University of New Mexico Professor Geoffrey Miller explained that in courtship, the best gifts are "the most useless to women and the most expensive to men." Flowers. Pricey dinners. Jewelery. The less useful, the better. Waste is the most efficient way to a woman's heart.

What if I don't want to buy gifts this year? What does that say about me?

You're a dude, and you're probably miserable.

In the 1970s, one study found that just 6% of its participants would consider not giving any Christmas gifts. But if you're not feeling in the mood to hit the mall, it means you're probably a man. Studies have found that women are more enthusiastic about gift giving, give more gifts than they receive, and tend to be happier with their gift selections. But by opting out of the Christmas spirit, you might not be doing yourself any favors.

In 1982, University of Virginia Professor Theodore Caplow produced classic sociological study of Christmas gift giving in Muncie, Indiana. Caplow found that there was a rigid expectation that people would buy gifts not only for their entire extended family, but also their in-laws. Failing to do so was extremely taboo. But once you went beyond kin, gift-giving became more optional. Caplow theorized that there were two main reasons for Muncie's militant stance Christmas gift-giving. First, family networks were people's most important relationships. Second, marriages in Muncie, like the rest of America, had become increasingly fragile. Elaborate, ritualized gift-giving was a way of maintaining the peace with both your spouse and their clan. In the end, it was about signaling which relationships people valued most.

Ok, fine, I'll go buy a gift. Do I have to wrap it?

Yes.

Believe it or not, there have actually been studies on the value of gift wrapping. A team of Australian researchers observed a Christmas gift-wrap stall, interviewed 20 subjects, and ran workshops where they asked people to wrap one gift for someone they were close to and another for an acquaintance. Their conclusion? A gift should look like a gift. Wrap it up.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Jordan Weissmann is a senior associate editor at The Atlantic.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

What Is the Greatest Story Ever Told?

A panel of storytellers share their favorite tales, from the Bible to Charlotte's Web.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In