A Third of 30- and 40-Somethings Don't Go Online for Fun—What's Wrong With Them?

More

What percentage of thirty- and forty-somethings go online just to pass the time? I asked a few writers at The Atlantic. Their guesses matched my own. "Ninety percent," said one thirty-something. "One hundred percent," said another (nearly) thirty-something. "Eight-five percent" and  "seventy-nine percent" were other guesses. ("Thirty percent," said a younger editor, who also allowed that "I don't really know any 40-year olds.")

All wrong. The answer is 66 percent, according to a new Pew survey on Internet use. A third of them don't go online for fun? Surprising. Even more surprising, one fifth of Americans in their teens and twenties claim they "never" go online for fun, which strikes me as an example of the phenomenon some surveyors call "lying through one's teeth."

It also raises a reasonable follow-up question: What's the heck wrong with all of these people? Don't they know how awesome the Internet is?

Go online for fun and to pass the time

A methodological explanation for this survey is that respondents had different definitions of "just for fun." Does going online to watch a movie count as "a particular reason" or it is a fun way to pass the time? Are you reading this website "just for fun"? Some of you might say it's your news source that fulfills your civic responsibility to follow current events. Others might consider it a non-essential diversion. (We welcome both groups, by the way!)

Most of the articles about this report concluded that the Internet was now, officially, a giant and growing waste of time. That's the wrong interpretation. A better interpretation is that the Internet is a rapidly growing reservoir of extremely affordable leisure attention. Much of the Internet's entertainment is free (or at least, there is no additional cost once you've paid for or secured an Internet connection), but it generates real value. It saves us time and time. It offers real rewards. Brad DeLong put it best:

Given a choice between doubling the amount of calories consumed by the typical middle-class American family--or doubling the amount of furniture purchased, or doubling the amount of automobiles owned, or doubling the number of clothes in our closets--and halving the time we must spend searching for what we want to buy, to read, to watch, to listen to, can anyone think that this is a difficult choice?

And don't forget that mindless procrastination makes us more productive in the long run.


Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

A Technicolor Time-Lapse of Alaska's Northern Lights

The beauty of aurora borealis, as seen from America's last frontier


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Time-Lapse of Alaska's Northern Lights

The beauty of aurora borealis, as seen from America's last frontier

Video

What Do You Wish You Learned in College?

Ivy League academics reveal their undergrad regrets

Video

Famous Movies, Reimagined

From Apocalypse Now to The Lord of the Rings, this clever video puts a new spin on Hollywood's greatest hits.

Video

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In