Growth Revised Down to 2%—Should We Be Worried?


Firms cut inventories for the first time since 2009, which either indicates that hiring will slow or flourish

600 inventory shelves REUTERS Jason Reed.jpg

Apparently even a modest 2.5% rate of growth is too good to be true. Third quarter GDP growth has been revised down to an annualized rate of 2.0% today by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Although most components shifted a little here or there, inventories were major reason for the big revision. Is this good or bad news?

First, here's how the GDP chart looks now, with the new revision for the third quarter:

gdp 2011-q3 r1.png

You can see just how weak 2011 looks. Every single quarter in 2011 has exhibited weaker growth than any of the previous five quarters. The recovery just can't find firm footing. The annualized rate of growth through the first three quarters of 2011 is just 1.2%.

A big reason for the revision was that inventories shrunk by $8.5 billion during the quarter. Initially, they were thought to have grown by $5.4 billion. This change results in third quarter marking the first time when businesses allowed inventories to shrink since the fourth quarter of 2009 -- when hiring first turned negative. The following chart shows why today's revision might provide some cause for concern:

inv v ps jobs 2011-q3.png

As you can see, when firms are liquidating inventories, bad things tend to happen to jobs. It might be particularly surprising to see firms cut inventories in the third quarter, as the holiday season approaches. In the third quarter of 2010, inventories rose by an aggressive $92.3 billion.

The chart above might hint that job losses are coming, but consumer spending tells a different story. Here's how it has changed over the same period:

spending 2011-q3 v3.png

In fact, spending was relatively strong in the third quarter -- it grew by the most since 2010. So demand is actually improving. What could be going on here is that firms aren't hiring aggressively enough to respond to that new demand, so they were forced to liquidate more of their inventory than expected. This would actually be a very positive development, as it implies that companies will have to hire more aggressively in coming quarters to keep up with sales growth.

So we'll have to see how the economy does over the next few months. Although growth is certainly weaker than would be ideal, the reason for this revision isn't necessarily a signal of coming economic doom. It could just be that firms were too pessimistic and have already begun realizing that they must hire more workers to keep up with demand. That could mean stronger job growth in the latter part of 2010 and early 2011.

Image Credit: REUTERS/Jason Reed

Jump to comments
Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

A Fascinating Short Film About the Multiverse

If life is a series of infinite possibilities, what does it mean to be alive?

Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus


The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.


How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe


A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.


I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."


Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion



More in Business

Just In