Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Democrats Propose Another Surtax on Millionaires

By Megan McArdle
Oct 5 2011, 3:08 PM ET Comment

According to the Wall Street Journal, Democrats are attempting to revive the president's jobs bill by proposing a 5% surtax on all income earned above $1 million--capital gains, dividends, whatever.  I'm not seeing how this revives the bill, since the GOP is probably going to filibuster it anyway.  But it's certainly an interesting proposal.


If we add in the Medicare surtaxes which start in 2013, then for a person earning a million dollars a year (we really need a better word for this than "millionaire", which already has a meaning), the marginal tax rate on long-term investment income for this group jumps to 24% in 2013, from 15% now, while the marginal tax rate on earned income will be (assuming the Bush tax cuts expire like they're supposed to) 48.5%.  This of course does not include any state income taxes, or property taxes.  The tax penalty on earned income seems likely to rise well over 50% for the typical high earner under Democratic plans.  Most left-leaning pundits and wonks do not seem to believe that millionaires pay attention to decreasing returns to effort.  I confess, I'm a bit more skeptical.

The real question, however is this: what do you do for an encore?  They're hiking taxes on this lucky group 5% to pay for one temporary jobs measure.  What happens the next time Democrats need some money to pay for something?  Surely we need to leave millionaires a little something for themselves on their marginal dollar, say 10%--a sort of tip for good service.  And the state and local tax people will want their bite too, so you'll need to leave another 10-15% so that those high-tax jurisdictions where sound Democratic politicians like Senator Schumer campaign can enjoy their full bite.

Since the current trend is a 4-5% hike on high-earners every time new spending is required, that seems to indicate that Democrats have only about five bites left at the apple.  Then they'll be out of money for new programs.  That's assuming, as they seem to, that rich people don't care about money, and will not change their behavior in response to higher tax rates.  If that assumption is wrong, then they reach the end of this particular rope much sooner.

Presumably the next step is people who make over $250,000 (which is, indeed, the group already targeted by the Medicare surtaxes).  But this group contains a lot of solid Democrats who do not, in my experience, think that the socially just marginal tax rate on such incomes is 80%.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer
How One Mother's Story Helped Change Obama's Gay Marriage Stance How A Mother's Story Changed Obama's Gay-Marriage Stance
The $630-Million Trees That Sparked a Social Media Revolt in China The $630-Million Trees That Sparked an Online Revolt
The Fake Magazines Used in Blade Runner Are Still Futuristic, Awesome Hey, Is That Really the Magazine From the Movie 'Blade Runner'?
Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…