Volcker: Inflation Can't Solve Our Problems

Let's imagine a country with excessive national debt. Its local governments also have borrowed way too much. And let's say its people also have a gigantic mound of consumer debt. In fact, many have mortgage balances higher than the value of their homes. And let's call this country the "United States of America" (the "U.S."). How do you fix the U.S.'s debt problems? One possible solution is to adopt higher levels of inflation.

The logic here is easy. As inflation rises, so do wages. That helps take care of the consumer debt problem faster: people begin making more in nominal dollars, some of which they can use to more quickly pay off their debt. Inflation also drives the nominal value of their homes higher to better match their mortgage balances.

And of course, the government debt problems fade too, since tax revenues would rise as wages are inflated. So federal and local governments can fix their budgets as well.

This all sounds great, which is why some progressives have suggested that the U.S. ought to just inflate away its debt problem. Unfortunately, there are some significant problems that higher inflation also creates. For one thing, it serves as a transfer from savers to borrowers. So it harms people who have sacrificed to have a more stable retirement, while helping people who have spent irresponsibly. But it also creates potential macroeconomic problems for a nation.

Who better to explain these to us than the former Federal Reserve Chairman responsible for ending the high-inflation era the U.S. experienced about three decades ago? Paul Volcker explained why intentionally raising inflation is so dangerous in a New York Times op-ed on Monday:

What we know, or should know, from the past is that once inflation becomes anticipated and ingrained -- as it eventually would -- then the stimulating effects are lost. Once an independent central bank does not simply tolerate a low level of inflation as consistent with "stability," but invokes inflation as a policy, it becomes very difficult to eliminate.

It is precisely the common experience with this inflation dynamic that has led central banks around the world to place prime importance on price stability. They do so not at the expense of a strong productive economy. They do it because experience confirms that price stability -- and the expectation of that stability -- is a key element in keeping interest rates low and sustaining a strong, expanding, fully employed economy.

Read the full story at the New York Times.

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Business

Just In