Apple After Jobs

Apple's share price shrugged as though the resignation of the company's visionary leader hardly mattered. That surprised me. Of course it helps that Jobs will still be chairman--though how active a chairman, and for how long, remain to be seen. And the top of the company is full of exceptionally talented people: that's clear. But it seems to me that Jobs's personality and the astonishing success of his company are as tightly integrated as...well, you know what.

Jobs did something entirely remarkable at Apple not once but twice, and that is counting conservatively. He did it partly by being brilliant, but also by being unafraid to be wrong. "Stay foolish," as he said in his wonderful Stanford commencement speech--the one thing on Jobs that everybody ought to be reading right now, though not necessarily for life lessons. "Stay foolish" is good advice to give to a genius, maybe not such good advice to give to those of us with talents that are less than astounding. He was a notoriously hands-on boss, in many ways a tyrant. Again and again, he bet his company (who else's company was it?) on instinct. No successor will have that freedom.

In the end Jobs's top priority was probably not to run the most successful computer company. Mainly, he cared about making the best computers. ("The only problem with Microsoft" he said in 1996, before Apple's rebirth, "is they just have no taste. They have absolutely no taste.") Of course, making the kind of devices that Jobs wanted to use himself was eventually a formula for fabulous success, but it did not have to be that way. He wasn't worried about what customers wanted--or, more precisely, thought they wanted. Market research is for also-rans. People don't know what they want until it's in front of them. As Jobs told Fortune in 2000:

[I]t's hard for [customers] to tell you what they want when they've never seen anything remotely like it. Take desktop video editing. I never got one request from someone who wanted to edit movies on his computer. Yet now that people see it, they say, "Oh my God, that's great!"

Even if you suppose that the assembled talent at Apple is sufficient to make up for Jobs's departure--a heroic assumption, I'd say--you need to understand that Tim Cook, the new CEO, and his team will not be able to run the company the way Jobs did. Magnificent self-indulgence, albeit married to ferocious self-discipline, is out. Their first concern cannot be to make the simplest, coolest, most enchanting and seamless devices: it will be to avoid wrecking a phenomenal enterprise that somebody else built. That is a crushing burden that Jobs never had to carry. I wish them well, but the fact that Jobs is a hard act to follow is the least of his successors' problems.

Presented by

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This wildly inventive short film takes you on a whirling, spinning tour of the Big Apple

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Desegregated, Yet Unequal

A short documentary about the legacy of Boston busing

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

Social Media: The Video Game

What if the validation of your peers could "level up" your life?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Business

Just In