Skip Navigation
Derek Thompson

Derek Thompson - Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he oversees business coverage for the website.
More

He is a visiting research fellow at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget at the New America Foundation. Derek has also written for Slate, BusinessWeek, and the Daily Beast. He has appeared as a guest on radio and television networks, including NPR, the BBC, CNBC, and MSNBC.

Why Are Some States Growing Faster Than Others? Dumb Luck

By Derek Thompson
Jun 28 2011, 12:30 PM ET Comment

The states with the biggest spending cuts are suffering from the steepest employment losses, according to this chart, which is getting a lot of play around the Web:


Adam Hersh, the author and chart-maker, is correct that state cuts hurt employment. But the correlation could go the opposite way, too. States that lose jobs also lose tax revenue. More lost revenue requires more spending cuts. State and local layoffs have slashed 326,000 jobs in the twelve months before May 2011, Dan Indiviglio found. That's steep, but it barely represents 0.2% of our labor force.

So what else is behind the graph's winners and losers? Take a closer look at what separates these state economies.

The states with the steepest employment losses on this chart are Nevada, Arizona, and Florida -- epicenters (a), (b), and (c) of the housing bust. That's not a coincidence. The housing market continues to be the most poisoned sector in the country. The states with the brightest employment pictures are North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas.* Each has strong petroleum and agrobusiness sectors, which fared extremely well before and immediately after the recession. That's not a coincidence, either. Nor is the fact that of the ten fastest growing states today, eight are concentrated in the energy, agriculture, food processing, and manufacturing industries.


One shouldn't discount spending cuts, which are clearly bad for short-term growth. But state spending cuts are a brush stroke in a bigger picture. Nevada and Arizona have attractive dry climates with lots of open space. They had a development boom in the 2000s whose devastation will take another decade to clean up. Texas and the Dakotas, on the other hand, didn't. Today, they happen to sit on lots of scarce and valuable energy and agricultural resources, which are in high global demand now that China, India and Brazil are joining the middle class. Policies matter. Place isn't destiny. But don't underestimate the importance of pure geographical luck.

_____
*Texas also has one of the largest projected deficits for next year, so maybe we should hold some of our enthusiastic applause.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The Color, Romance, and Impact of the Golden Gate at 75 America's Most Famous Bridge Turns 75
Romney's Plan to Save Higher Ed: Let the Private Sector Handle It Romney's Plan to Save Higher Ed
Buying a Piece of America: Why Chinese Shoppers Love U.S. Brands Why Chinese Shoppers Love American Brands
The Fake Magazines Used in Blade Runner Are Still Futuristic, Awesome Hey, Is That Really the Magazine From the Movie 'Blade Runner'?
What It Means That Computers Can Tell These Smiles Apart, But You Can't Which Smile Is Fake? (This Computer Knows)

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)