Clive Crook likes this proposal from Martin Feldstein:
I think this is a pretty good proposal. But it's also a depressing proposal, because ultimately what we're looking for is a way to pretend that we aren't raising taxes. The end result of "cutting tax expenditures" is that taxpayers are going to be sending more money to Washington every year. But apparently, we can't tell them this. We have to dress it up as a spending cut, or a harmless tweak of deductions that won't affect very many people. But this is going to be a major hit for a large number of taxpayers, many of whom will not be particularly rich.
Don't get me wrong: I think there are good economic reasons to support simplification. But I do not think that these reasons are why tax simplification is catching on. It's gaining traction because politicians know they need to raise revenue, but they also know that they can't say this to voters.
On the other hand, this is really not the time to be choosy about budget solutions. If we have to pass the right bill for the wrong reasons, I'm okay with that.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus