OECD: U.S. Outspends Average Developed Country 141% in Health Care

More

In health care spending, we are still number one. And it isn't even close.

The United States spends 51% more than the world's second-biggest health-care spender, Norway, and 141% more than the average OECD country, according to a new survey. Our life expectancy, at 77.9 years, is about a year and a half below the OECD average.

When you graph it out, clusters appear. Rich, East-Asian countries like Korea and Japan have 80+ life expectancies with below-average spending. Western Europe clogs the middle, with Sweden and Switzerland enjoying the longest lives (Sweden relies on public insurance, while Switzerland relies heavily on private insurance). The U.S., however, barely fits on the map.

us health care costs.png

The only OECD countries with levels of uninsured people comparable to the U.S.? Mexico and Turkey, which appear at the bottom of the line in the graph above.

The OECD's grand conclusion from studying the world's health care systems is, well, that there are few grand conclusions to draw from the world's health care systems. Countries with public insurance do about as well as countries with private insurance. But there are some micro-recommendations. Prices should be more transparent; consumers should bear more costs for non-catastrophic health care; hospitals should coordinate care and be paid according to performance rather than their sheer number of treatments.

One particularly fascinating section explains how three countries with private-dominant health care systems -- Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland -- provide equitable care for sick and poor patients:
Interestingly, inequalities tend to be relatively low in three of the four countries with a private insurance-based system - Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. One reason may be that regulations in these countries - such as the requirement on insurers to enrol any applicant and equalisation schemes across insurers to compensate for high risk enrolees - can help limit the hunt for better-off patients and the desire to shed bad risks (so-called "cream-skimming"). These and other potential biases can be caused by market mechanisms if left unchecked. Note that inequalities are often caused by factors that have little to do with the health care system itself, such as social status and education.



Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Social Security: The Greatest Government Policy of All Time?

Social Security is the most effective anti-poverty program in U.S. history. So why do some people hate it?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Adventures in Legal Weed

Colorado is now well into its first year as the first state to legalize recreational marijuana. How's it going? James Hamblin visits Aspen.

Video

What Makes a Story Great?

The storytellers behind House of CardsandThis American Life reflect on the creative process.

Video

Tracing Sriracha's Origin to Thailand

Ever wonder how the wildly popular hot sauce got its name? It all started in Si Racha.

Video

Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In