Madoff Is Right

More

Clients who did no due diligence and demanded high returns in slow markets enabled his scheme, Madoff says in a new from-prison interview

Cohen_Madoff_3-1__B_banner.jpg

Disgraced financier Bernard Madoff may be a lying, conniving scoundrel, with gusts up to psychopath, but that doesn't mean he's wrong.

Some of his clients were greedy. Among the smartest and most sophisticated investors in the country, they should have known that their Madoff-infused investment returns, year after year, profit after profit, were simply too good to be true. But these clients, these best and brightest, consistently cast aside reasonable skepticism (and due diligence) so long as the golden returns kept coming in. In Bernie We Trust, they said, as they looked away from the improbability of it all and toward the balances on their account statements.

From Steve Fishman's fantastic New York magazine interview with Madoff (who among us would not have accepted that collect call from prison?) we are reminded that these folks were earning 15 percent back on their money even in a "slow" market. This stubborn fact, now the subject of litigation, has been obscured over the past two years as compelling, media-savvy victim after compelling, media-savvy victim has stepped forward to heap scorn upon Madoff, the confessed swindler now serving a 150-year sentence.

But culpability for this disaster shouldn't be a zero-sum proposition. And there is plenty of blame to go around. Fishman writes: "But Madoff distributes the guilt. 'Look.' he said, 'these banks and these funds had to know there were problems.' Madoff told them absolutely nothing about how he made those returns. 'I wouldn't give them any facts, like how much volume I was doing. I was not willing to have them come up and do the due diligence that they wanted. I absolutely refused to do it. I said, "You don't like it, take your money out," which of course they never did.'"

This was not a bank robbery. There are different classes of victims here. Some, at the top of the pyramid, made money off Madoff for years before it all crashed down. Some, at the bottom of the scheme, did not. Some were little old ladies who lost it all. Some were high-powered brokers who were playing an edge and who now, Claude-Rains-like, claim to be shocked -- shocked! -- that Madoff's results were illegitimate. This doesn't diminish the enormity of Madoff's crimes. But it does provide them with important context. Having already lost it all, Madoff has nothing to lose by saying so and for that, at least, he deserves some credit.

Image credit: AFP/Getty Images/Don Emmert

Jump to comments
Presented by

Andrew Cohen is a contributing editor at The Atlantic. He is a legal analyst for 60 Minutes and CBS Radio News, and a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

How have stories changed in the age of social media? The minds behind House of Cards, This American Life, and The Moth discuss.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In