Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

A Good Year for the Fed, as It Makes $80.9 Billion

By Daniel Indiviglio
Jan 10 2011, 4:59 PM ET Comment

Wall Street banks weren't the only ones who had a pretty good 2010: the U.S. central banks also made a boatload of money. The Federal Reserve announced today that its net income was $80.9 billion in 2010. That's 51.5% better than its healthy 2009 profit of $53.4 billion. And there's good news for taxpayers here: they get $78.4 billion of it.

So why did the Fed do so well? You may have heard the phrase: you've got to spend money to make money. The Fed has been spending an awful lot of money over the past few years. Its balance sheet has swelled to over $2 trillion from less than $1 trillion in 2006. Almost all of that is in Treasury securities and government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) debt. Those are the sources where the lion's share of its profit came from. They accounted for $76.2 billion of its $80.9 billion profit. Other sources included a few billion dollars here and there from its financial crisis programs and interventions.

What does it mean that the Treasury gets this big cash infusion back from the Fed? It's a pretty good deal for the Treasury, as it essentially reduces its borrowing costs. The Treasury sells securities to the Fed. The Fed then creates money out of thin air to purchase them. The Treasury pays the central bank interest, and eventually buys back the par value of those securities. That leaves the Fed with the interest as almost pure profit, since it has essentially no borrowing costs. As a result, most of the interest becomes profit and goes back where it came from: to the U.S. Treasury.

Unless the Fed begins losing money on some of the other assets on its balance sheet, you can expect the bank to have a nice return next year as well. By mid-2011, it will hold an even larger balance of government securities than it did at the end of 2010, thanks to its November announcement of $600 billion in additional purchases.

Is this monetizing debt? Not exactly, but the Treasury could ultimately end up paying a negative real interest rate on these securities, depending on inflation. So a little bit of debt may be monetized after all. If nothing else, the Fed clearly subsidizes some U.S. debt, as it provides something like an interest-free loan.



Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40, but They're Still Dirty The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40
50 Cent Endorses Marriage Equality; Wonders Why There's No 'White History Month' 50 Cent's Mixed Gay Marriage Endorsement
Watch and Buy: Kickstarter Is the Hipster Home Shopping Network Kickstarter Is the Hipster Home Shopping Network
The Revenge of the Rust Belt: How the Midwest Got Its Groove Back The Revenge of the Rust Belt
Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)