Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

New Jersey's Tunnel Vision

By Megan McArdle
Oct 7 2010, 10:45 AM ET Comment

I agree (almost*) entirely with Paul Krugman about the second rail tunnel from New Jersey to New York:


Many reports that Chris Christie is about to scuttle the second rail tunnel under the Hudson. If so, it's arguably the worst policy decision ever made by the government of New Jersey -- and that's saying a lot.

The story seems to be that Christie wants to divert the funds to road and bridge repair; but in so doing he would (a) lose huge matching funds from the Port Authority and the Feds (b) delay indefinitely a project NJ needs desperately ASAP. He could avoid these consequences by raising gasoline taxes. But no, taxes must never be raised, no matter what the tradeoffs.

And it's a social bad too: now is very much the time when we should be ramping up infrastructure spending, not cutting it.

Awesome.

Whatever you think of rail projects elsewhere, they work in the Northeast.  In the case of the New York tri-state area, that's too mild; the fact is, the city could't work without rail.  There's simply no way to cram more people onto the island of Manhattan without mass transit.  Not only are the three major entry points from New Jersey thoroughly bottlenecked, but also, the streets are so congested that bringing more cars in would be disastrous.  And since Manhattan already has roads about everywhere you can put one, the only answer is rail.

To the extent that New Jersey benefits from salaries earned on Wall Street, and other high-paying New York industries--and it does benefit, quite a lot--the rail tunnel will benefit the state by allowing it to get more workers into and out of the city every day.  Unfortunately, improvements to roads and bridges are visible, while rail tunnels are out of sight.  The benefits from road repairs--smoother roads--are direct and obvious; the benefits from another rail tunnel--more frequent trains--are less noticeable, and less likely to be attributed to the project that made them possible.

That's why really expensive infrastructure projects--like the ever-proposed, never-delivered buildouts of the New York City subway system--so often end up getting scuppered when a recession hits.  The pain is immediate, the benefits nebulous, and the legislature scared.

Chris Christie has proven himself willing to make hard political choices for the benefit of his state.  I hope that he's willing to suffer a little short term cost in order to make a big difference for New Jersey commuters--even if they don't appreciate it.

* Really, the state of New Jersey has made so many stupid policy decisions, I don't think you can single this one out.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Study of the Weekend: Keep Your Commute to Less Than 15 Miles (Or Else) The Deadly Commute
The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control? The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control?
How the Global Middle Class Can Save the American Middle Class How the Global Middle Class Can Save America's Middle Class
The New Economics of Happiness The New Economics of Happiness
Chris Matthews and Newt Gingrich: The Most Entertaining (and Reptile-Centric) Political Interview Ever Gingrich Meets Matthews: A Reptile-Centric Interview

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…