Stop Being So Productive

More

Very little about the 2010's slow recovery should surprise us except the unemployment rate, according to a new report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Why is unemployment so much higher than expected? Everybody has their own explanation. Matt Yglesias might point out that the stimulus was expressly designed to raise production rather than employment. Northwestern economist Robert Gordon might cite all sorts of reasons why employment hasn't recovered after the last few recessions, such as executive incentives to juice earnings reports by keeping hiring down. More conventionally, we might blame globalization and technology for hollowing out the middle class while health care inflation nibbled away at median wages.

Fed senior economist Kenneth R. Beauchemin has another explanation. You're working too damn hard. Yes. You.

While the model expected the unemployment rate to have fallen to an average of 8.0 percent last quarter, the actual rate remained stubbornly high at 9.7 percent for two consecutive quarters, and it is currently flirting with the upper probability band marking the 95th percentile.

A fair bit of the back-story here is doubtlessly the tremendous productivity growth recorded during the past year, which has allowed businesses to stretch existing labor, finding efficiencies where they could, with workers who were quite happily employed despite the extra effort they were required to expend. But that just pushes the puzzle into a deeper realm.

Productivity is good thing. But too much of a good thing, remember, isn't necessarily great. Productivity tends to rise during times of high unemployment, because workers feel lucky to have a job and employers squeeze the few workers they have before committing an extra $70K on a new employee's wages and benefits. That's one reason why some economists cheered the news that productivity fell in the latest report. Smaller output-per-hour (that's what productivity measures) is bad for corporate earnings, but good for workers if it means that companies have squeezed the employees dry and have no choice but to hire more.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

The Ghost Trains of America

Can a band of locomotive experts save vintage railcars from ruin?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Video

What If Emoji Lived Among Us?

A whimsical ad imagines what life would be like if emoji were real.

Video

Living Alone on a Sailboat

"If you think I'm a dirtbag, then you don't understand the lifestyle."

Video

How Is Social Media Changing Journalism?

How new platforms are transforming radio, TV, print, and digital

Video

The Place Where Silent Movies Sing

How an antique, wind-powered pipe organ brings films to life

Feature

The Future of Iced Coffee

Are artisan businesses like Blue Bottle doomed to fail when they go mainstream?

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In