Since When Is It Nice to Raise Taxes and Cut Benefits?

More

This post is part of our forum on Michael Kinsley's October cover story exploring the legacy of the Baby Boomers and what they owe the country. Follow the debate here.

Mike Kinsley's embrace of Maya MacGuineas tells a lot about what counts as "niceness," to both of them.  It's not the consequences of their proposals.

I take a different view.  To me, it's brutally unfair to suggest that the estate tax go lightly on big fortunes while cutting into lower-middle-class homes and small businesses.  And this is what Kinsley's suggestion amounts to.

Likewise Maya MacGuineas's suggestion that Social Security and Medicare be means-tested: it's both politically and socially nasty.  Politically, because without universality the programs quickly become tarred as welfare. Socially, because once that happens, they'll be cut, elderly poverty will rise and the old will lose access to health care.

MacGuineas writes that the Boomers "were in charge for much of the period when Social Security and Medicare surpluses were used to finance the rest of government."   The accurate way to state this point, would be this: "Since 1983 all  working Americans paid far more in payroll taxes than current beneficiaries required, while taxes were cut for the wealthy."  I cannot see why this is an argument for cutting Social Security and Medicare for those same working Americans, now about to retire.

The simple, effective way to do what MacGuineas claims to want is to enact more progressive taxes on income, capital gains and estates. That way, people with more money pay more. Maya, why not do it this way? Given the premise of your piece, you can't very well argue that it's unrealistic.

And my tone is counterproductive?  Frankly, I hoped my comment about "intellectual laziness" would  sting, and I'm glad  it did.  It was directed at a brazen distortion of a very basic fact: most older Americans are not nearly as rich as Kinsley made them out to be.

The debate continues here.
Can the Boomers Save America?

Jump to comments
Presented by

James Galbraith

James K. Galbraith is the author of The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too.  He holds the Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr. Chair in Business/Government Relations at The University of Texas at Austin.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The US is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In