How I Think About the Bush Tax Cuts

The debate about the Bush tax cuts is pretty absurd, when you think about it.

In 2001 and 2003, when the federal deficit hit a record $374 billion (!), Congress voted for the tax cuts to be temporary. In 2010, with the deficit over $1.3 trillion for the second consecutive year, Congress is only debating options to make the tax cuts permanent. Only in Washington...

To my knowledge, there is only one Democratic Senate bill on the Bush tax cuts. That bill comes from Sen. Max Baucus and it permanently extends 80 percent of the tax cuts forever. In the next ten years, this will cost us somewhere between $2.3 trillion and $3 trillion in lost revenue, or more than three Recovery Acts.

And that's the financially prudent option. The Republican bill from Sen. Mitch McConnell's office makes the whole dang thing permanent (and goes even further to slash the estate tax) at the cost of nearly $4 trillion, according to some estimates.

That is the state of our tax cut debate. Do we want to extend this entire fiscal time bomb, or only the vast majority of it?

The political solution seems self-evident. We cannot extend these tax cuts forever, but neither can we dropkick the average consumer with a $1000 tax increase next year by letting it expire. So extend the tax cuts for few years only and then make some overdue reforms to the tax code.

Should we extend them for the rich, too? From an accounting standpoint, the answer is not particularly meaningful. Raising taxes to their 1999 levels on the top few percentiles alone will save us about $65 billion in revenues in the next two years (compared with the $700 billion figure you see for the decade-long cost of keeping the rich tax cuts). Sixty-five billion dollars is real money, but it's a droplet in our debt projections -- about 0.7 percent the $9 trillion CBO expects the U.S. to rack up this decade.

Bottom line: any talk about permanence is fairly crazy at this point. Don't pass either of these bills. Extend, briefly, and then reform.

Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Business

Just In