Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Why Won't the Fed Inflate?

By Megan McArdle
Aug 27 2010, 8:20 AM ET Comment

Kevin Drum has a roundup of commentary from many smart commentators I admire.  They're hardly alone; everyone hates the Fed!  Why won't they get us out of this mess?

Here's one possibility: because many of the people who are now complaining that they are too tight, are the same ones who until very recently were loudly complaining that they were too loose during the last recession.  There's been a pretty vibrant cottage industry in placing the  blame for the housing bubble squarely on the frail shoulders of one Alan Greenspan.  He is a convenient villain for liberals, who hate his politics, and conservatives, who hate the sort of technocratic institution he represents.  Blaming Alan Greenspan allows liberals to dodge uncomfortable questions about the unintended consequences of government intervention, and conservatives to dodge uncomfortable questions about whether free markets can produce really, really bad outcomes.

All this Fed blaming puts the political independence of the Fed more at risk, and it makes the Fed folks antsy.  Ben Bernanke probably doesn't want to end up having to do the humiliating round of mea culpas that Greenspan had to.  That's probably going to give him, and the other members of the open market committee, a slightly deflationary bias.  Especially since there are some very smart people making this sort of argument, and hey, what if they're right?  Maybe the Fed wasn't serious enough about inflation!

Obviously, I recognize that there are lots of factors at play.  They always believed, as far as I could tell, that their policy of stealth bank-recapitalization would take a while, but was the only politically possible way to get adequate funds into the banks; absent disaster, they may just want to wait and see how it works out. Non-traditional monetary policy may be harder to undo, may have more unintended consequences, and might, at this point, send a confidence-weakening signal about where the Fed believes the economy is headed.  It's also clear that a substantial number of folks at the Fed think what's wrong in the economy right now is not, in fact, particularly amenable to their remedy--they need massive stimulus to budge the unemployment needle only a little.  Maybe they're wrong but it's not strictly crazy, given that we've had massive stimulus, and budged the unemployment needle only a little.

But I do think if you have been lustily berating the Federal Reserve for causing the housing bubble with its inappropriate reaction to the last recession (and its stubbornly lingering unemployment), then you probably shouldn't also be berating them for not being loose enough this time around.  There is no such thing as a perfect Fed; it's always going to err on one side or another.  You said you wanted a Fed that didn't err on the loose side; now you have it.  This is what that looks like.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control? The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control?
Buying a Piece of America: Why Chinese Shoppers Love U.S. Brands Why Chinese Shoppers Love American Brands
'Tis the Season to be Hateful (in Sports) It's Okay to Hate Sports Stars
50 Cent Endorses Marriage Equality; Wonders Why There's No 'White History Month' 50 Cent's Mixed Gay Marriage Endorsement
Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of American Education Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of Education

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Just In

View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…