Second Quarter GDP Growth Revised to a Weaker 1.6%

The second quarter was worse than we thought. The new estimate of GDP released today revised growth down to 1.6% from the first estimate of 2.4%, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Considering that the initial estimate was somewhat disappointing after much better growth in the prior two quarters, this second number is extremely discouraging. Economists mostly saw this coming, however. Their prediction for the revision was just a little worse at 1.3%. The change can be mostly blamed on weaker net exports and business investment.

But before getting into any of the specifics, here's the historical GDP growth chart:

gdp 2010-q2 rev2.png

You can see that Q2 growth now matches that of the third quarter of 2009, when the technical recovery began.

As mentioned, one of the biggest drivers of the revision was net exports. The U.S. imported even more and exported even fewer goods and services than first estimated. Exports only grew by $35.8 billion instead of $40.3 billion as was initially thought. Imports, however, were way off. They grew by $142.2 billion, well above the $127.8 first estimate. That resulted in the trade gap growing by $19.0 billion more than anticipated, pulling down the initial GDP growth estimate by 0.6%. As Americans buy more goods and services from abroad than they sell to those nations, it results in less national income.

The next big change was in private investment. Its new figure revised down growth by 0.4%. This can be almost entirely attributed to inventories, which did not grow as aggressively as anticipated.

Now, if you add both those declining factors together, you might notice that you get a 1.0% decrease -- more than the 0.8% drop reported. That's because personal consumption expenditures were actually revised up by 0.2%. This might sound like good news, but in this case, it doesn't really indicate that Americans were feeling more comfortable spending. The rise was almost entirely due to housing and utilities services spending. So this spending probably isn't all discretionary.

The only other major component not mentioned, government spending, was essentially unrevised.

Today's report doesn't contain any good news. We're learning that the hope for an exports-led recovery looks a little dimmer, as net exports are actually making things worse. Moreover, businesses are not as confident as we thought, since they're investing less in their inventories to prepare for future demand than originally believed.

This new estimate, however, is not the final word. A third revision will occur next month. At this point, it's hard to know how much it will change, but it's fairly likely that the move won't be as significant as the variance between the first and second revisions that we saw today.

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.


What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Business

Just In