Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Mass Layoffs Up in June

By Daniel Indiviglio
Jul 23 2010, 11:47 AM ET Comment

More firms engaged in mass layoffs in June, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The results are disappointing. The number of workers laid off through mass actions of fifty or more increased by 7.2% compared to May. But more alarming is the number of firms that participated in these activities, which increased by 16.6%. That's the biggest jump since August of 2009.

First, here's the chart for the number of workers let go through mass layoffs:

mass layoffs - workers - 2010-06.PNG

The red line above shows number of workers laid off through mass actions each month. The green line is the average from January 2004 through November 2007, before the recession. As you can see, there was a big pop in April, followed by a huge drop in May. Even though June trended in the other direction, it didn't come near reversing all of the decline from May. The level of workers laid off through mass actions each month appears to be normalizing around the 150,000 level, since late last year, if you ignore the noise in the chart. That's a little higher than the pre-recession average of around 132,000.

But in order to gauge business sentiment, it may be more telling to look at how many firms engaged in mass layoffs. Here's that chart:

mass layoffs - firms - 2010-06.PNG

It's harder to talk yourself out of worrying about June's increase here. Again, it doesn't hit the April spike, but it does rise above the number of firms that had mass layoffs in February and March. This could imply that relatively smaller businesses are reducing their workforces. On this chart, the past several months don't appear to be settling around any number, so we might be seeing mass layoff actions moving from large firms to smaller ones. That would bring the overall number of workers affected down, but leave the number of firms taking these actions relatively high.

Considering that we know smaller businesses are still struggling and growing more pessimistic, this hypothesis seems plausible. If this is the case, then a labor market recovery will be even that more difficult. Most job growth comes from smaller firms. If many are still laying people off, then this confirms a very slow decline for the unemployment rate.



Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Can Full-Metal jousting Become the Next Ultimate Fighting Championship? Can Full-Metal Jousting Become the Next UFC?
The Global Dangers of Syria's Looming Civil War The Dangers of Syria's Looming Civil War
Iran War Would Cost Trillions: Will the GOP Pay More Taxes for That? Would the GOP Raise Taxes to Fund a War With Iran?
Was Facebook Inevitable? Was Facebook Inevitable?
We Don't Need a Digital Sabbath, We Need More Time You Don't Need a Break From Technology

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Athens in Flames

Feb 13, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)