Shaping the Future of Finance, at 3:18am

It was sausage making at its grizzliest.

As most of America slept Thursday night, a few dozen members of Congress, their army of aides, and a handful of reporters sat in a large wood-paneled room where the future of the financial industry would be decided. The final day of the rushed conference committee to meld together a few thousand pages of new regulation began at 9:45am earlier that morning. The lawmakers finally completed work at 5:39am on Friday.

Why did these politicians force their staffs and the journalists who chase them to work so late? They had promised President Obama that the bill would be finalized prior to this weekend's G-20 meeting in Toronto. The President wanted to be able to tell world leaders about the new regulations the U.S. is on the verge of putting in place. The process this sense of urgency created was simply incredible to watch.

And the best part was that you didn't need to be in the room to witness the historic event: it was all televised by C-Span. So I watched the proceedings, along with probably two or three other concerned Americans, until the very end. I was so fascinated it was hard to look away. With a surreal dreamlike event like this, who needs sleep?

The two most controversial measures were saved until the very end. The Volcker Rule and derivatives didn't get brought up until after 11pm Thursday night. By this time, some in attendance had already begun to leave. With many open seats, proxy votes were necessary for key changes. Of course, those who remained were likely beginning to check out mentally at this late hour. The yawning had begun. In the hours that followed, gallons of diet coke were consumed and snacks were everywhere. At one point, Chairman Dodd (D-CT) was even waving around a half eaten candy bar as he spoke.

It got to the point where debate stopped mattering. Sometimes several politicians might be displeased with how a proposal was written, but so what? They began to realize that the more they complained, the longer they would be there. And God, it was late.

Covered bonds served as a prime example of an important provision that got lost in the night. It passed as a bipartisan measure by the House conferees a few days prior, and they understood the Senate might choose to revise the legislation slightly before sending it back. Instead, the Senate Democrats quietly killed it, because the Treasury and FDIC had concerns. Once House members realized this in the wee hours of the morning, however, they were hardly in a position to fight for this constructive addition to the bill. The Senate promised it would hold a hearing instead.

One of the problems with revising an amendment was procedure. Every time language was changed, the physical bill required revision. That meant aides needed to create a new version, and make copies for all conferees to read and consider before the changes could be voted on. Consequently, after each title was revised, there were lengthy delays while the copy machine slowly killed trees.

A compromise on the Volcker Rule eventually was agreed to very early Friday morning. Then, there were derivatives to deal with. When better to tackle arguably the most complicated aspect of financial regulation than after some 15 hours of committee, in the morning's single-digit hours? As was expected, Republicans protested that the aggressive rules would harm the U.S. economy. Naturally, Democrats responded that a crack-down on Wall Street was necessary. With a minority of votes, Republicans could do little more than shake their heads.

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Business

Just In