How Easy Should Walking Away From a Mortgage Be?

More

One of the reasons why foreclosures have been so prevalent is because in some states they are relatively painless. States with non-recourse mortgages simply allow homeowners to walk away from their homes, no questions asked. That has resulted in lots of underwater homeowners realizing that it doesn't pay to keep paying their house, so they simply stop and find somewhere cheaper to live. California has a non-recourse policy for new mortgages, but not for refinanced loans. A new law would reconcile this disparity.

Currently, the state has a sort of odd two-tiered system. When you buy a home, the original loan is non-recourse, so you can just walk away. But if you refinance the home, then the bank can chase after your assets to collect the full balance if you default. Lawmakers want to reconcile these two scenarios, so they sought to make these refinanced loans non-recourse too.

For the obvious reason of wanting a claim on this debt, banks objected. As a result, the law was revised before it passed. The New York Times reports:

The bill that passed the Senate by a lopsided vote of 30 to 4 would protect former homeowners up to the amount of their original loan. For instance, a family that took out a $500,000 mortgage to buy a house and then refinanced and took cash out, swelling their loan to $600,000, would be released from claims on the original sum but remain vulnerable on the $100,000.

This is a strange sort of hybrid. It would provide banks with a little protection, but also still provide some cover for homeowners to walk away if their loans are way underwater. It's a compromise.

On one hand, it's a welcome change. Banks arguably have too much incentive to persuade borrowers with great offers for cash-out refinancing. This sucks equity out of the housing market. Under current law, not only do banks get additional loan volume out of the deal, but suddenly the original mortgage also becomes full-recourse. This may have been part of the motivation on the part of banks to offer current homeowners wacky new mortgage products that included a cash bonus. Through the new law, however, any additional loan would stand on its own.

On the other hand, non-recourse loans are a problem for the housing market, as strategic defaults continue to occur in large numbers. While it's a nice idea to provide homeowners the opportunity to simply walk away from a home if they don't feel like paying their obligation anymore, it makes the housing market's problems worse. Every time a borrower chooses to strategically default, home inventory increases. That puts pressure on home prices. Values then decline further, and more homeowners find themselves underwater. Consequently, those homeowners then begin considering strategic default. You can see the downward spiral that occurs.

These full-recourse refinanced mortgages were actually helping to prevent some homeowners from foreclosing by choice. If given the opportunity to walk with a much smaller debt due, they may decide to do so. That could worsen California's housing market. According to the bill, however, it won't be effective until June 1, 2011, so Californians can hope that its housing market has exhausted most of its foreclosures by then.

Ultimately, this law would correct a sort of loophole for banks to refinance their way out of non-recourse loans. But it also raises the question of whether that loophole might be helping to prevent the state's housing market from deteriorating even further. While it's undesirable to force homeowners to stay in underwater homes, it might be worse if the state finds itself sliding down a steeper slope to lower home prices.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

What Do You See When You Look in the Mirror?

In a series of candid video interviews, women talk about self-image, self-judgment, and what it means to love their bodies


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Adventures in Legal Weed

Colorado is now well into its first year as the first state to legalize recreational marijuana. How's it going? James Hamblin visits Aspen.

Video

What Makes a Story Great?

The storytellers behind House of CardsandThis American Life reflect on the creative process.

Video

Tracing Sriracha's Origin to Thailand

Ever wonder how the wildly popular hot sauce got its name? It all started in Si Racha.

Video

Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In