Central Banks and Politics

Most of what you've read lately about the "crisis of economics" is rubbish. The Great Recession poses no challenge to the core ideas of modern macroeconomics. The notion that mainstream economics claimed that bubbles cannot happen, or deplored any and all financial regulation, or advocated laissez faire, or upheld any of the other shibboleths that the past two years have supposedly refuted, is ridiculous. Please note that critics of the policies that helped cause the recession almost invariably do so from within the prevailing paradigm--using lines of argument that were already well developed.

The nearest thing to an exception to this is central-bank independence. Here is an idea that was very widely accepted--not as a foundational principle of mainstream macroeconomics, obviously, but nonetheless as a clear-cut commandment. This principle has been cast aside--and rightly so--during the response to the emergency, first in the US and now in Europe. But the idea is so tenacious that nobody seems willing to admit it. Here, as my new column for the FT argues, is a big idea of orthodox economics that really does need to be re-examined.    

Presented by

Why Principals Matter

Nadia Lopez didn't think anybody cared about her middle school. Then Humans of New York told her story to the Internet—and everything changed.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A History of Contraception

In the 16th century, men used linen condoms laced shut with ribbons.

Video

'A Music That Has No End'

In Spain, a flamenco guitarist hustles to make a modest living.

Video

What Fifty Shades Left Out

A straightforward guide to BDSM

More in Business

Just In