Skip Navigation
Derek Thompson

Derek Thompson - Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he oversees business coverage for the website.
More

He is a visiting research fellow at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget at the New America Foundation. Derek has also written for Slate, BusinessWeek, and the Daily Beast. He has appeared as a guest on radio and television networks, including NPR, the BBC, CNBC, and MSNBC.

The 3-D TV Market is Set to Explode. But Why?

By Derek Thompson
Mar 10 2010, 1:00 PM ET Comment

The 3-D TV market sounds like it's about to explode. I don't completely understand why.

Don't get me wrong: I love television, I love all three dimensions, and together I'm sure they could make something just splendid. But why would I buy a 3-D television today, when prices are high (as they always are for first-time technologies without widespread competition) and precious few networks are offering 3-D content? We are essentially talking about an expensive normal television (all of Samsung's 3-D TVs are 2-D compatible) that can play 3-D editions of a handful of movies, if you're willing to don the goggles. What's the rush to buy these products right now?

Don't get me wrong, just about any innovation is good innovation, and I'm pleased to see hardware designers aiming high. Panasonic announced that it expects to unload 500,000 3-D TVs in the United States in the first year, "half its annual global sales target," according to Reuters.

I'm holding out for something better: 3-D without the glasses.

Philips' WOWvx technology uses image-processing software, plus display hardware that includes sheets of tiny lenses atop LCD screens. The lenses project slightly different images to viewers' left and right eyes, which the brain translates into a perception of depth...

The multiple images allow viewers to walk around the viewing area--a cone about 20 degrees wide--without disturbing the 3-D illusion.

The challenge will be to design a television that bursts with three dimensions for the lucky few in the "viewing cone" and also operates as a perfectly functional 2-D television for viewers outside the cone.

When I first heard about this technology, I asked this question: if you can design a TV set that projects slightly different images, could you somehow have a single television set tuned to two different channels? In other words (and maybe this would require the glasses, again) could I watch a football game without sound on my 3-D TV while my friend to the right watches Jersey Shore on the same set, with volume? Open question to techies out there.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The New Economics of Happiness The New Economics of Happiness
The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control? The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control?
Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer
Chris Matthews and Newt Gingrich: The Most Entertaining (and Reptile-Centric) Political Interview Ever Gingrich Meets Matthews: A Reptile-Centric Interview
How the Global Middle Class Can Save the American Middle Class How the Global Middle Class Can Save America's Middle Class

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)