Borrowing Becomes More Expensive for Obama than Buffett?

Bloomberg has an article today with one of those fabulous headlines guaranteed to garner lots of clicks: "Obama Pays More Than Buffett as U.S. Risks AAA Rating." So naturally, I nearly replicated it here. As it turns out, U.S. debt is becoming pricier to issue than that of some AAA-rated companies, billionaire investor Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway included. Is the bond market correct or crazy to require more yield for U.S. debt?

Here's a blurb from the article:

Two-year notes sold by the billionaire's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in February yield 3.5 basis points less than Treasuries of similar maturity, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Procter & Gamble Co., Johnson & Johnson and Lowe's Cos. debt also traded at lower yields in recent weeks, a situation former Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. chief fixed-income strategist Jack Malvey calls an "exceedingly rare" event in the history of the bond market.

What sticks out to me there is the term of the notes: two years. So essentially, these investors are betting that there's a higher likelihood that the U.S. will default on its debt in the next two years than Berkshire, P&G, J&J and Lowe's. Oh c'mon! Is there any chance of the U.S. defaulting so soon?

I doubt it, very highly. Even if you think that the U.S. government is on an unsustainable spending path (and I do), it's pretty extreme to think that the nation will actually default on its debt. And it's even crazier to think that will happen in the next two years. Private firms, on the other hand, could more likely experience some sudden shock leading to their bankruptcy in the short-term. 

When it comes to longer-term U.S. debt, I could, however, kind of understand if investors began to demand a higher yield. There's a significantly greater likelihood, for example, that the U.S. could default 10 or 20 years down the road. Unless the government gets serious about deficit reduction and paying down some of its borrowing over the next decade, we'll be in serious trouble. So if you think Washington is too dysfunctional to manage its spending, then you may think that default could one day happen. But in the next two years, I just don't see it.

>

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Why Is Google Making Human Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors at a world-class life sciences lab are trying to change the way people think about their health.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Videos

Why Is Google Making Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors are changing the way people think about health.

Video

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Business

Just In